ABSTRACT
Objective: Main issues in the treatment of hypertension are the low level of blood pressure (BP) control and the economic burden for health care systems. Mobile application with telemonitoring of BP could contribute to better control and lower costs by reducing office visits. This could be useful nowadays with difficult access to health system due to covid-19. The purpose of this study was to investigate if an innovative management strategy of hypertension, such as the use of ESH care application for smartphones combined with a dedicated platform, could improve hypertension control and replace frequent office visits. Design and method: 30 uncontrolled hypertensive patients, treated or untreated [mean age 53 ± 9 years, mean office BP (OBP) 146.3 ± 6.2 / 92.5 ± 9 mmHg, 53% men, 33% smokers, 23% with hypercholesterolemia] were randomized to the application assisted strategy (AAS) (17 patients), where a mobile phone application was offered to communicate home BP measurements (HBPm), or to regular office visits (13 patients). Patients BP measurements (HBPm for AAS and OBP for standard care group) were evaluated in 1 and 3 months with treatment titration if uncontrolled. In all patients OBP and ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) were evaluated in 6 months. Results: In both groups the reduction in OBP and ABPM was significant in 6 months. In the AAS group the reduction in systolic/diastolic OBP and 24 h systolic/ diastolic BP in 6 months was -26.5 ± 5.6 / -19.4 ± 8.2 mmHg (p < 0,001) and -19.6 ± 7.7 / -13.8 ± 4.8 mmHg (p < 0.001), respectively. In the standard care group, the reduction in systolic/diastolic OBP and 24 h systolic/diastolic BP in 6 months was -22.6 ± 9.7 / -9.6 ± 11 mmHg (p < 0.005) and -18.4 ± 6.0 / - 8.8 ± 4.4 mmHg (p < 0.001). In AAS group compared to standard care group there was a greater reduction in 24 h diastolic BP (-13.8 ± 4.8 mmHg vs -8.8 ± 4.4 mmHg, p = 0.016) and in diastolic OBP (-19.4 ± 8.2 mmHg vs -9.6 ± 11.0 mmHg, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The present results indicate that the monitoring of patients through a mobile health tool could be useful in hypertension management as it is correlated with better BP control compared to office visits. The trial is still enrolling patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective: While there are several studies that have focused on the role of face masks in preventing airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2, few data are available on their effects on physiological measures, and no study has examined their effects on blood pressure (BP). The purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of surgical masks on BP in drug-treated hypertensive patients who had a routine follow-up visit to a university hospital outpatient hypertension clinic. Design and method: The study included already treated hypertensive patients aged > 18 years, while the exclusion criteria were atrial fibrillation or any other arrhythmia affecting the BP measurement, an arm circumference > 42 cm, mental disorders, Parkinson disease, pregnancy, intolerance to the BP measurement method, or unwillingness to participate. A new surgical mask was provided to all participants to replace the face mask that was already in use. After the routine mask-on office BP measurement, patients were left alone and randomized to automated office BP measurement, with measurements taken after first wearing a mask for 10 min, then without wearing the mask for 10 min, and vice versa. Results: A total number of 265 patients were included in the study. Among the participants, 115 were women (43.4%), the mean age was 62 ± 12 years, and the mean office BP was 134 ± 15 / 81 ± 12 mmHg. There was no significant difference between mask-on unattended systolic BP (133 ± 15 mmHg) and mask-off unattended systolic BP (132 ± 15 mmHg) (P = 0.13) or between mask-on unattended diastolic BP (77 ± 13 mmHg) and mask-off unattended diastolic BP (76 ± 13 mmHg) (P = 0.32). Moreover, there was no difference in the heart rate (mask-on first, 69 ± 11 bpm;mask-off first, 69 ± 11 bpm, P = 0.7). Conclusions: Common surgical masks do not affect systolic/diastolic BP levels during unattended BP measurements in treated hypertensive patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Few data have been published regarding the holistic approach of post- Covid patients, examining physical health. The purpose of our study was to examine the impact of arterial hypertension in the cardiopulmonary status of post-covid patients 3 months after the first day of infection. Design and Method: All participants who recovered Covid-19 infection underwent cardiorespiratory exercise using either Bruce or modified Bruce protocol where all parameters were evaluated and transthoracic echocardiogram. The population was separated into two groups based on history of hypertension. Group I (n = 29) included hypertensive subjects and Group II (n = 75) included normotensive subjects. Results and Conclusion: A total of 104 patients were assessed 3 months after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. We recorded a mean age of 49 ± 15 years, 50.5% of them were males, 8.7% had a history of coronary heart disease. Hypertensives had higher BMI (29.24 ± 24 vs 26.64 kg/m2 p < 0.01) and BSA (2.09 ± 0.25 vs. 1.95 ± 0.58, p = 0.001). They were hospitalized in higher percentage comparing to normotensives (72.4% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.01). Left atrial diameter (41 ± 6 vs. 35 ± 5.5 mm, p < 0.001) was significantly larger in hypertensives. Furthermore, A wave (79 ± 21 vs. 58 ± 18 cm/s p < 0.001) and ratios of E/A (1.01 ± 0.42 vs. 1.28 ± 0.44, p < 0.01) and E/E (7.3 ± 3.7 vs. 5.9 ± 4.3, p < 0.01) differed between two groups. Finally, LVEF (%) was significantly impaired in hypertensive comparing to normotesive subjects (53 ± 13% vs. 59 ± 7%). This finding was depicted in lower maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 22 ± 4.5 vs. 28 ± 8 ml/kg/min p < 0.001), metabolic equivalents (METS) at peak, 9.1 ± 3 vs. 14 ± 20 p < 0.001), maximum heart rate (maxHR 147 ± 17 vs. 165 ± 21 bpm p < 0.001) and HR1st minute recovery (123 ± 28 vs. 138 ± 21 bpm, p: 0.02) comparing to normotensive. Systolic blood pressure (SBP 180 ± 29 vs. 165 ± 25mmHg, p: 0.02) during the 1st minute of recovery was higher in hypertensives. Finally, the duration of exercise was significantly lower in patients with hypertension (7.3 ± 2.7 vs. 9 ± 4 min, p:0.02). To conclude, the current study highlighted the negative impact of hypertension in the ability to exercise. Regardless of the disease severity, post-covid patients need a comprehensive approach for rehabilitation including the modification of risk factors like hypertension and obesity.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Main issues in the treatment of hypertension are the low level of blood pressure (BP) control and the economic burden for health care systems. Mobile application with telemonitoring of BP could contribute to better control and lower costs by reducing office visits. This could be useful nowadays with difficult access to health system due to covid-19. The purpose of this study was to investigate if an innovative management strategy of hypertension, such as the use of ESH care application for smartphones combined with a dedicated platform, could improve hypertension control and replace frequent office visits. Design and method: 30 uncontrolled hypertensive patients, treated or untreated [mean age 53 ± 9 years, mean office BP (OBP) 146.3 ± 6.2 / 92.5 ± 9 mmHg, 53% men, 33% smokers, 23% with hypercholesterolemia] were randomized to the application assisted strategy (AAS) (17 patients), where a mobile phone application was offered to communicate home BP measurements (HBPm), or to regular office visits (13 patients). Patients' BP measurements (HBPm for AAS and OBP for standard care group) were evaluated in 1 and 3 months with treatment titration if uncontrolled. In all patients OBP and ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) were evaluated in 6 months. Results: In both groups the reduction in OBP and ABPM was significant in 6 months. In the AAS group the reduction in systolic/diastolic OBP and 24 h systolic/ diastolic BP in 6 months was -26.5 ± 5.6 / -19.4 ± 8.2 mmHg (p < 0,001) and -19.6 ± 7.7 / -13.8 ± 4.8 mmHg (p < 0.001), respectively. In the standard care group, the reduction in systolic/diastolic OBP and 24 h systolic/diastolic BP in 6 months was -22.6 ± 9.7 / -9.6 ± 11 mmHg (p < 0.005) and -18.4 ± 6.0 / - 8.8 ± 4.4 mmHg (p < 0.001). In AAS group compared to standard care group there was a greater reduction in 24 h diastolic BP (-13.8 ± 4.8 mmHg vs -8.8 ± 4.4 mmHg, p = 0.016) and in diastolic OBP (-19.4 ± 8.2 mmHg vs -9.6 ± 11.0 mmHg, p = 0.04) Conclusions: The present results indicate that the monitoring of patients through a mobile health tool could be useful in hypertension management as it is correlated with better BP control compared to office visits. The trial is still enrolling patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Although the effect of face masks on preventing airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is well studied, few data are available on their effects on physiological measures and no study has evaluated their effect on blood pressure (BP). The purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of surgical masks on BP in drug-treated hypertensive patients who had a routine follow-up visit to a university hospital outpatient hypertension clinic. Design and method: The study included already treated hypertensive patients aged > 18 years, while the exclusion criteria were atrial fibrillation or any other arrhythmia affecting the BP measurement, an arm circumference > 42 cm, mental disorders, Parkinson's disease, pregnancy, intolerance to the BP measurement method, or unwillingness to participate. Following the routine mask-on office BP measurement, patients were left alone and randomized to automated office BP measurement, with measurements taken after first wearing a mask for 10 min, then without wearing the mask for 10 min, and vice versa. Results: A total number of 265 patients were included in the study. Among the participants, 115 were women (43.4%), the mean age was 62 ± 12 years, and the mean office BP was 134 ± 15/81 ± 12 mmHg. There was no significant difference between mask-on unattended systolic BP (133 ± 15 mmHg) and mask-off unattended systolic BP (132 ± 15 mmHg) (P = 0.13) or between mask-on unattended diastolic BP (77 ± 13 mmHg) and mask-off unattended diastolic BP (76 ± 13 mmHg) (P = 0.32). Moreover, there was no difference in the heart rate (mask-on, 69 ± 11 bpm;mask-off, 69 ± 11 bpm, P = 0.7). Conclusions: The results of our study indicate that common surgical masks do not affect systolic/diastolic BP levels during unattended BP measurements.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Few data have been published regarding the holistic approach of post- Covid patients, examining physical health. The purpose of our study was to examine the impact of arterial hypertension in the cardiopulmonary status of post-covid patients 3 months after the first day of infection. Design and method: All participants who recovered Covid-19 infection underwent cardiorespiratory exercise using either Bruce or modified Bruce protocol where all parameters were evaluated and transthoracic echocardiogram. The population was separated into two groups based on history of hypertension. Group I (n = 29) included hypertensive subjects and Group II (n = 75) included normotensive subjects. Results: A total of 104 patients were assessed 3 months after the onset of COVID- 19 symptoms. We recorded a mean age of 49 ± 15 years, 50.5% of them were males, 8.7% had a history of coronary heart disease. Hypertensives had higher BMI (29.24 ± 24 vs 26.64 kg/m2, p < 0.01) and BSA (2.09 ± 0.25 vs. 1.95 ± 0.58, p = 0.001). They were hospitalized in higher percentage comparing to normotensives (72.4% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.01). Left atrial diameter (41 ± 6 vs. 35 ± 5.5 mm, p < 0.001) was significantly larger in hypertensives. Furthermore, A wave (79 ± 21 vs. 58 ± 18 cm/s, p < 0.001) and ratios of E/A (1.01 ± 0.42 vs. 1.28 ± 0.44, p < 0.01) and E/E' (7.3 ± 3.7 vs. 5.9 ± 4.3, p < 0.01) differed between two groups. Finally, LVEF (%) was significantly impaired in hypertensive comparing to normotesive subjects (53 ± 13% vs. 59 ± 7%). This finding was depicted in lower maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 22 ± 4.5 vs.28 ± 8 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001), metabolic equivalents (METS) at peak, 9.1 ± 3 vs. 14 ± 20, p < 0.001), maximum heart rate (maxHR 147 ± 17 vs. 165 ± 21 bpm, p < 0.001) and HR1st minute recovery (123 ± 28 vs. 138 ± 21 bpm, p: 0.02) comparing to normotensive. Systolic blood pressure (SBP, 180 ± 29 vs. 165 ± 25mmHg, p: 0.02) during the 1st minute of recovery was higher in hypertensives. Finally, the duration of exercise was significantly lower in patients with hypertension (7.3 ± 2.7 vs. 9 ± 4 min, p:0.02) Conclusions: the current study highlighted the negative impact of hypertension in the ability to exercise. Regardless of the disease severity, post-covid patients need a comprehensive approach for rehabilitation including the modification of risk factors like hypertension and obesity.